4.7 Article

Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival

期刊

HUMAN REPRODUCTION
卷 16, 期 3, 页码 411-416

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.3.411

关键词

cryoprotectants; exposure time; human oocyte cryopreservation; oocyte survival; sucrose concentration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The success of human oocyte cryopreservation depends on morphological and biophysical factors that could influence oocyte survival after thawing, Various attempts to cryopreserve human oocytes have been performed with contrasting results, Therefore the effect of some factors, such as the presence or absence of the cumulus oophorus, the sucrose concentration in the freezing solution and the exposure time to cryoprotectants, on human oocyte survival after thawing were investigated, The oocytes were cryopreserved in 1,2-propanediol added with sucrose, using a slow-freezing-rapid-thawing programme. After thawing, the oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and the outcomes of insemination and subsequent embryo development were also recorded, The post-thaw cryosurvival rate was not different for the oocytes cryopreserved with their cumuli partially removed mechanically (56%) when compared with those cryopreserved with their cumuli totally removed enzymatically (53%), On the contrary, a significantly higher survival rate was obtained when the oocytes were cryopreserved in the presence of a doubled sucrose concentration (0.2 mol/l) in the freezing solution and the survival rate was even higher when the sucrose concentration was tripled (0.3 mol/l) (60 versus 82% P < 0.001). Furthermore, a longer exposure time (from 10.5 to 15 min) to cryoprotectants, before lowering the temperature, significantly increased the oocyte survival rate (P < 0.005). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection produced a good fertilization rate (57%) of thawed oocytes and a high embryo cleavage rate (91%) and a satisfactory embryo morphology was observed (14 and 34% for grade I and grade II embryos respectively).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据