4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Cassava starch maltodextrinization/monomerization through thermopressurized aqueous phosphoric acid hydrolysis

期刊

APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 91-3, 期 -, 页码 469-478

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1385/ABAB:91-93:1-9:469

关键词

starch; hydrolysis; phosphoric acid; maltodextrinization; astaxanthin; byproducts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kinetic conditions were established for the depolymerization of cassava starch for the production of maltodextrins and glucose syrups. Thin-layer chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography analyses corroborated that the proper H,PO, strength and thermopressurization range (e.g., 142-170 degreesC; 2.8-6.8 atm) can be successfully explored for such hydrolytic purposes of native starch granules. Because phosphoric acid can be advantageously maintained in the hydrolysate and generates, after controlled neutralization with ammonia, the strategic nutrient triplet for industrial fermentations (C, P, N), this pretreatment strategy can be easily recognized as a recommended technology for hydrolysis and upgrading of starch and other plant polysaccharides. Compared to the classic catalysts, the mandatory desalting step (chloride removal by expensive anion-exchange resin or sulfate precipitation as the calcium-insoluble salt) can be avoided. Furthermore, properly diluted phosphoric acid is well known as an allowable additive in several popular soft drinks such as colas since its acidic feeling in the mouth is compatible and synergistic with both natural and artificial sweeteners. Glycosyrups from phosphorolyzed cassava starch have also been upgraded to high-value single-cell protein such as the pigmented yeast biomass of Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma), whose astaxanthin (wiketo-dihydroxy-beta -carotene) content may reach 0.5-1.0 mg/g of dry yeast call. This can he used as an ideal complement for animal feeding as well as a natural staining for both fish farming (meat) and poultry (eggs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据