4.5 Review

Genome instability, cancer and aging

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-GENERAL SUBJECTS
卷 1790, 期 10, 页码 963-969

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.03.020

关键词

Aging; Cancer; DNA damage; Genome instability; Stem cell; Epimutation; Senescence; Apoptosis

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [AG17242, AG20438, ES11044, AG-SS-1496-05]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES [U01ES011044] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [P01AG017242, R01AG020438] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA damage-driven genome instability underlies the diversity of life forms generated by the evolutionary process but is detrimental to the somatic cells of individual organisms. The cellular response to DNA damage can be roughly divided in two parts. First, when damage is severe, programmed cell death may occur or, alternatively, temporary or permanent cell cycle arrest. This protects against cancer but can have negative effects on the long term, e.g., by depleting stem cell reservoirs. Second, damage can be repaired through one or more of the many sophisticated genome maintenance pathways. However, erroneous DNA repair and incomplete restoration of chromatin after damage is resolved, produce mutations and epimutations, respectively, both of which have been shown to accumulate with age. An increased burden of mutations and/or epimutations in aged tissues increases cancer risk and adversely affects gene transcriptional regulation, leading to progressive decline in organ function. Cellular degeneration and uncontrolled cell proliferation are both major hallmarks of aging. Despite the fact that one seems to exclude the other, they both may be driven by a common mechanism. Here, we review age-related changes in the mammalian genome and their possible functional consequences, with special emphasis on genome instability in stem/progenitor cells. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据