4.5 Article

Barotropic aspects of the dynamics of the Gulf of Naples (Tyrrhenian Sea)

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 455-471

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00100-X

关键词

barotropic dynamics; numerical modelling; shallow water equations; seiches; Gulf of Naples; Tyrrhenian Sea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Process-oriented studies are carried out in order to analyze barotropic dynamical features in the Gulf of Naples: gravitational normal mode oscillations (seiches) of the gulf and depth-averaged circulations induced directly by the wind and remotely by the large-scale Tyrrhenian circulation. The shallow water equations are solved numerically in a domain which includes the Gulf of Naples and an external buffer zone whose role is two fold: it is required to remove the effect of a fictitious boundary in the determination of the seiches and it allows the imposition of boundary conditions related to the large-scale circulation in the Tyrrhenian Sea, which contributes to determine the internal circulation via topographic coupling. The seiches are studied by means of a spectroscopic analysis in which eigenoscillations are generated by the relaxation of a wind setup. The eigenperiods corresponding to the main seiches are determined and the corresponding horizontal spatial structures are presented. Good agreement is found when comparing these numerical modelling results with tide gauge records. The wind and boundary-driven depth-averaged circulation in the gulf is then studied by imposing idealized local winds and external currents chosen on the basis of realistic modelling of the wind-driven circulation of the Tyrrhenian Sea. Both quasi-steady and typical transient-time dependence are taken into account, so that a series of circulation schemes is obtained representing typical dynamic scenarios in the Gulf of Naples. The results are related to the observations and good agreement is found. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据