4.0 Article

Benthic primary production in two perennially ice-covered Antarctic lakes: patterns of biomass accumulation with a model of community metabolism

期刊

ANTARCTIC SCIENCE
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 18-27

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0954102001000049

关键词

Antarctic lakes; benthic photosynthesis; carbon cycling; microbial mat

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A mathematical model was used to simulate interannual patterns of biomass accumulation within benthic microbial mats of two Antarctic lakes. Lakes Hoare and Vanda are in the Dry Valley region of Southern Victoria Land, and are both perennially ice covered. The model combines experimentally derived observations of light/photosynthesis relationships and rates of respiration of mats from a range of depths in these lakes, with data on incident radiation and the optical properties of the ice and water column. The model was used to estimate daily and annual production and, using measured carbon content, the potential vertical accumulation of the mats over a year. An annual pattern of photosynthesis was predicted far both lakes, with net production from October to February and net respiration at other times. Predicted rates and patterns of net photosynthesis were remarkably similar in the two lakes, despite differences in light climate: the ice of Lake Hoare transmits 1-4% incident radiation, whereas that of Lake Vanda transmits up to 20%. Maximum daily rates of 15-20 mug carbon cm(-2) were predicted to occur at approximately 10 m depth in both lakes. Maximum annual rates of carbon fixation (at 10-12 m depth) in both lakes were c. 1.2 mg carbon cm(-2) equating to approximately 0.1-4 mm vertical accumulation of mat each pear. Experimental studies of microbial mats in the lakes revealed horizontal laminations of similar thickness to model estimates, supporting the hypothesis that these were annual layers. Differences between model estimates and observations were found in deeper water in Lake Vanda, where considerably more material accumulated than was predicted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据