4.7 Article

Direct activation of rat spinal dorsal horn neurons by prostaglandin E2

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
卷 21, 期 5, 页码 1750-1756

出版社

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-05-01750.2001

关键词

inflammation; central sensitization; prostaglandin E2; EP2 receptor; deep dorsal horn; allodynia; hyperalgesia

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS038253, NS38253-01] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whole-cell patch-clamp and intracellular recording techniques have been used to study the action of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) on neurons in adult rat transverse spinal cord slices. Bath-applied PGE2 (1-20 muM) induced an inward current or membrane depolarization in the majority of deep dorsal horn neurons (laminas III-VI; 83 of 139 cells), but only in a minority of lamina II neurons (6 of 53 cells). PGE2 alone never elicited spontaneous action potentials; however, it did convert subthreshold EPSPs to suprathreshold, leading to action potential generation. PGE2-induced inward currents were unaffected by perfusion with either a Ca2+-free/high Mg2+ (5 mM) solution or tetrodotoxin (1 muM), indicating a direct postsynaptic action. Both 17-phenyl trinor prostaglandin E2 (an EP1 agonist) and sulprostone (an EP3 agonist) had little effect on membrane current, whereas butaprost methyl ester (an EP2 agonist) mimicked the effect of PGE2. Depolarizing responses to PGE2 were associated with a decrease in input resistance, and the amplitude of inward current was decreased as the holding potential was depolarized. PGE2-induced inward currents were reduced by substitution of extracellular Na+ with N-methyl-D-glucamine and inhibited by flufenamic acid (50-200 muM), which is compatible with activation of a nonselective cation channel. These results suggest that PGE2, acting via an EP2-like receptor, directly depolarizes spinal neurons. Moreover, these findings imply an involvement of spinal cord-generated prostanoids in modulating sensory processing through an alteration in dorsal horn neuronal excitability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据