4.5 Article

Responses of tail fescue cultivars to an irrigation gradient

期刊

CROP SCIENCE
卷 41, 期 2, 页码 350-357

出版社

CROP SCIENCE SOC AMER
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2001.412350x

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Seasonal availability of water is a major consideration in the management and selection of plant materials for irrigated pastures in the Intermountain West, USA. Objectives were to evaluate the forage field of 10 tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) strains and cultivars across five irrigation levels and fo elucidate the effects of the endophytic fungus Neotyphodium coenophialum (Morgan-Jones & Gems) Glenn, Bacon & Hanlin an productivity and trends. a differ-source irrigation system was used in a 2-yr study, Significant differences were detected among the fan fescue entries for dry matter yield (DMY), and differences were relatively consistent across wafer levels (WL) as indicated by the nonsignificant cultivar x WL interaction and significant correlations among WL. Trends in DMY across WL were largely curvilinear; however, linear bends were much more predominant during the late summer and fall. Stability parameters, based on regression of cultivar x WL X year means on their respective WL x gear means, differed among cultivars in analyses including all harvests but were relatively uniform (b approximate to 1.0) for most cultivars later in the season. Differentes in DMY between 'Ky 31' tall fescue infected with the Neotyphodium endophyte and its endophyte-free counterpart confirms earlier reports of the positive effect of this fungal organism on forage yield in fall fescue, particularly in water-limited environments. Seasonal distribution of yield was primarily determined by water availability during the late summer and fall. The relative consistency in DMY of the cultivars across WL indicates that annual yield averaged across levels of wafer stress mould be a logical criterion for selection of germplasm for irrigated pastures in the Intermountain Region.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据