4.5 Article

Spectrum of dominant mutations in the desmosomal cadherin desmoglein 1, causing the skin disease striate palmoplantar keratoderma

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 197-203

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200605

关键词

desmosome; cadherin; desmoglein; dominance; epidermis; keratoderma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adhesive proteins of the desmosome type of cell junction consist of two types of cadherin found exclusively in that structure, the desmogleins and desmocollins, coded by two closely linked loci on human chromosome 18q12.1. Recently we have identified a mutation in the DSG1 gene coding for desmoglein 1 as the cause of the autosomal dominant skin disease striate palmoplantar keratoderma (SPPK) in which affected individuals have marked hyperkeratotic bands on the palms and soles. In the present study we present the complete exon-intron structure of the DSG1 gene, which occupies approximately 43 kb, and intron primers sufficient to amplify all the exons. Using these we have analysed the mutational changes in this gene in five further cases of SPPK. All were heterozygotic mutations in the extracellular domain leading to a truncated protein, due either to an addition or deletion of a single base, or a base change resulting in a stop codon. Three mutations were in exon 9 and one in exon 11, both of which code for part of the third and fourth extracellular domains, and one was in exon 2 coding for part of the prosequence of this processed protein. This latter mutation thus results in the mutant allele synthesising only 25 amino acid residues of the prosequence of the protein so that this is effectively a null mutation implying that dominance in the case of this mutation was caused by haploinsufficiency. The most severe consequences of SPPK mutations are in regions of the body where pressure and abrasion are greatest and where desmosome function is most necessary. SPPK therefore provides a very sensitive measure of desmosomal function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据