4.7 Article

Correction of liver disease following transplantation of normal rat hepatocytes into long-evans cinnamon rats modeling Wilson's disease

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 302-309

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1006/mthe.2001.0271

关键词

cell; treatment; ATP 7B; copper; bile

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [P30 CA13330] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [MO1 RR12248] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK41296, R01 DK46952] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To establish the efficacy of cell therapy in Wilson's disease, we used the Long-Evans Cinnamon (LEC) rat model with atp7b gene mutation and copper toxicosis. Several groups of LEC rats were established, including animals pretreated with retrorsine to exacerbate copper toxicosis and inhibit proliferation in native hepatocytes followed by partial hepatectomy to promote liver repopulation. Hepatocytes from normal, syngeneic LEA rats were transplanted intrasplenically. Animal survival, biliary copper excretion, and hepatic copper were determined. The magnitude of liver repopulation was demonstrated by measuring serum ceruloplasmin and hepatic atp7b mRNA. Long-term survival in LEC rats treated with retrorsine, partial hepatectomy, and cell transplantation was up to 90%, whereas fewer than 10% of animals pretreated with retrorsine, without cell therapy, survived, P < 0.001. Liver repopulation occurred gradually after cell transplantation, ranging from <25% at 6 weeks, 26 to 40% at 4 months, and 74 to 100% at 6 months or beyond. Liver repopulation restored biliary copper excretion capacity and lowered liver copper levels. Remarkably, liver histology was completely normal in LEC rats with extensive liver repopulation, compared with widespread megalocytosis, apoptosis, oval cell proliferation, and cholangiofibrosis in untreated animals. These data indicate that liver repopulation with functionally intact cells can reverse pathophysiological perturbations and cure Wilson's disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据