4.5 Review

Calcium channels and migraine

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1828, 期 7, 页码 1655-1665

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2012.11.012

关键词

Calcium channel; Migraine; Spreading depression; Channelopathy; Trigeminal ganglion; Cerebral cortex

资金

  1. University of Padova (Strategic Project: Physiopathology of Signaling in Neuronal Tissue)
  2. Fondazione Cariparo (Excellence Project: Calcium Signaling in Health and Disease)
  3. Telethon-Italy [GGP06234]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Missense mutations in CACNA1A, the gene that encodes the pore-forming alpha(1) subunit of human voltage-gated Ca(v)2.1 (P/Q-type) calcium channels, cause a rare form of migraine with aura (familial hemiplegic migraine type 1: FHM1). Migraine is a common disabling brain disorder whose key manifestations are recurrent attacks of unilateral headache that may be preceded by transient neurological aura symptoms. This review, first, briefly summarizes current understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms that are believed to underlie migraine headache, migraine aura and the onset of a migraine attack, and briefly describes the localization and function of neuronal Ca(v)2.1 channels in the brain regions that have been implicated in migraine pathogenesis. Then, the review describes and discusses i) the functional consequences of FHM1 mutations on the biophysical properties of recombinant human Ca(v)2.1 channels and native Ca(v)2.1 channels in neurons of knockin mouse models carrying the mild R192Q or severe S218L mutations in the orthologous gene, and ii) the functional consequences of these mutations on neurophysiological processes in the cerebral cortex and trigeminovascular system thought to be involved in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the insights into migraine mechanisms obtained from the functional analysis of these processes in FHM1 knockin mice. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium channels. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据