4.2 Article

Acute mountain sickness; Prophylactic benefits of antioxidant vitamin supplementation at high altitude

期刊

HIGH ALTITUDE MEDICINE & BIOLOGY
卷 2, 期 1, 页码 21-29

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC PUBL
DOI: 10.1089/152702901750067882

关键词

acute mountain sickness; oxygen free radicals; antioxidant vitamins; energy homeostasis; randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Free-radical-mediated damage to the blood-brain barrier may be implicated in the pathophysiology of acute mountain sickness (AMS). To indirectly examine this, we conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to assess the potentially prophylactic benefits of enteral antioxidant vitamin supplementation during ascent to high altitude. Eighteen subjects aged 35 +/- 10 years old were randomly assigned double-blind to either an antioxidant (n = 9) or placebo group (n = 9). The antioxidant group ingested 4 capsules/day(-1) (2 after breakfast/2 after evening meal) that each contained 250 mg Of L-ascorbic acid, 100 IU of dl-alpha -tocopherol acetate and 150 mg of alpha -lipoic acid. The placebo group ingested 4 capsules of identical external appearance, taste, and smell. Supplementation was enforced for 3 weeks at sea level and during a 10-day ascent to Mt. Everest base camp (similar to 5180 m). Antioxidant supplementation resulted in a comparatively lower Lake Louise AMS score at high altitude relative to the placebo group (2.8 +/-0.8 points versus 4.0 +/-0.4 points, P = 0.036), higher resting arterial oxygen saturation (89 +/-5% versus 85 +/-5%, P = 0.042), and total caloric intake (13.2 +/-0.6 MJ/day(-1) versus 10.1 +/-0.7 MJ/day(-1), P = 0.001); the latter is attributable to a lower satiety rating following a standardized meal. These findings indicate that the exogenous provision of water and lipid-soluble antioxidant vitamins at the prescribed doses is an apparently safe and potentially effective intervention that can attenuate AMS and improve the physiological profile of mountaineers at high altitude.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据