4.5 Article

Homology modeling of human CCR5 and analysis of its binding properties through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1808, 期 3, 页码 802-817

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.12.004

关键词

CCR5; Homology modeling; Molecular docking; Molecular dynamics simulation

资金

  1. Isfahan Pharmaceutical Sciences Research Center of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences [289170]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation were performed to explore structural features and binding mechanism of some inhibitors of chemokine receptor types (CCR5), and to construct a model for designing new CCR5 inhibitors for preventing HIV attachment to the host cell. A homology modeling procedure was employed to construct a 3D model of CCR5. For this procedure, the X-ray crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin (1F88A) at 2.80 angstrom resolution was used as template. After inserting the constructed model into a hydrated lipid bilayer, a 20 ns molecular dynamics (MD) simulation was performed on the whole system. After reaching the equilibrium, twenty-four CCR5 inhibitors were docked in the active site of the obtained model. The binding models of the investigated antagonists indicate the mechanism of binding of the studied compounds to the CCR5 obviously. Moreover, 3D pictures of inhibitor-protein complex provided precious data regarding the binding orientation of each antagonist into the active site of this protein. One additional 20 ns MD simulation was performed on the initial structure of the CCR5-ligand 21 complex, resulted from the previous docking calculations, embedded in a hydrated POPE bilayer to explore the effects of the presence of lipid bilayer in the vicinity of CCR5-ligand complex. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled Protein translocation across or insertion into membranes (c) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据