4.5 Article

Lipid membrane expansion and micelle formation by polymer-grafted lipids: Scaling with polymer length studied by spin-label electron spin resonance

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 1372-1383

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76110-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spin-label electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy and auxiliary optical density measurements are used to study lipid dispersions of N-poly(ethylene glycol)-dipalmitoyl phosphatidylethanolamine (PEG:5000-DPPE) mixed with dipalmitoyl phosphatidylcholine (DPPC). PEG:5000-DPPE bears a large hydrophilic polymer headgroup (with similar to 114 oxyethylene monomers) and is commonly used for steric stabilization of liposomes used in drug delivery. Comparison is made with results from mixtures of DPPC with polymer lipids bearing shorter headgroups (similar to 45 and 8 oxyethylene monomers), ESR spectra of phosphatidylcholine spin-labeled on the 5-C atom position of the sn-2 chain are shown to reflect the area expansion of the lipid membranes by the lateral pressure exerted in the polymer brush, in a way that is consistent with theory. The lipid chain packing:density at the onset of micelle formation is the same for all three PEG-lipids, although the mole fraction at which this occurs differs greatly. The mole fraction at onset scales inversely with the size of the polymer headgroup, where the experimental exponent of 0.7 is close to theoretical predictions (viz. 0.55-0.6). The mole fraction of PEG-lipid at completion of micelle formation is more weakly dependent on polymer size, which conforms with theoretical predictions. At high mole fractions of PEG:5000-DPPE the dependence of lipid packing density on mole fraction is multiphasic, which differs qualitatively from the monotonic decrease in packing density found with the shorter polymer lipids. Lipid spin-label ESR is an experimental tool that complements theoretical analysis using polymer models combined with the lipid equation of state.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据