4.5 Review

Structural polymorphism of non-covalent peptide-based delivery systems: Highway to cellular uptake

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOMEMBRANES
卷 1798, 期 12, 页码 2304-2314

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2010.06.005

关键词

Cell-penetrating peptide; Drug delivery; Conformational versatility; Biological membrane; Nanoparticle

资金

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  2. ANR (Agence Nationale de la Recherche) [ANR-06-BLAN-0071]
  3. European Community [QLK2-CT-2001-01451]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-06-BLAN-0071] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During the last two decades, delivery has become a major challenge for the development of new therapeutic molecules for the clinic. Although, several strategies either viral or non viral have been proposed to favor cellular uptake and targeting of therapeutics, only few of them have reach preclinical evaluation. Amongst them, cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) constitutes one of the most promising strategy and has applied for systemic in vivo delivery of a variety of therapeutic molecules. Two CPP-strategies have been described; using peptide carriers either covalently-linked to the cargo or forming non-covalent stable complexes with cargo. Peptide-based nanoparticle delivery system corresponds to small amphipathic peptides able to form stable nanoparticles with either proteins/peptides or nucleic acids and to enter the cell independently of the endosomal pathway. Three families of peptide-based nanoparticle systems; MPG, PEP and CADY have been successfully used for the delivery of various biologically active cargoes both ex vivo and in vivo in several animal models. This review will focus on the mechanism of the peptide-based nanoparticles; PEP, MPG and CADY in a structural and biophysical context. It will also highlight the major parameters associated to particle formation/stabilization and the impact of the carrier structural polymorphism in triggering cellular uptake. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据