4.6 Article

Binding of 125I-labeled ghrelin to membranes from human hypothalamus and pituitary gland

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION
卷 24, 期 3, 页码 RC7-RC9

出版社

EDITRICE KURTIS S R L
DOI: 10.1007/BF03343831

关键词

ghrelin; GH secretagogues (GHS); GHS analogs; cortistatin; somatostatin; vapreotide; pituitary; hypothalamus; receptors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ghrelin has been proposed as a natural ligand of the GH secretagogue receptor(s) (GHS-R), which was an orphan receptor activated by synthetic peptidyl (hexarelin) and non-peptidyl (MK-0677) GHS to strongly release GH in animals and humans. Herein we studied: 1) the binding of I-125-labeled human ghrelin to membranes from human hypothalamus and pituitary gland; 2) the ability of human ghrelin (either octanoylated or desoctanoylated), as well as of some GHS and neuropeptides to compete with the radioligand, The saturation binding analysis showed, in both tissues, the existence of a single class of high-affinity binding sites with limited binding capacity. The B-max (maximal number of binding sites) values of ghrelin receptors in the hypothalamus were significantly greater (p<0.001) than those detected in the pituitary, whereas the Kd (dissociation constant) values in the two tissues were similar. I-125-ghrelin bound to hypothalamic membranes was displaced by ghrelin, hexarelin, MK-0677, various GHS antagonists (EP-803 17, [D-Arg(1)-D-Phe(5)-D-Trp(7,9)-Leu(11)]-substance P) and some natural (cortistatin-14) and synthetic (vapreotide) SRIH-14 agonists, In contrast, no competition was seen in the presence of GHRH-44, SRIH-14 or desoctanoylated ghrelin, a ghrelin precursor that is devoid of GH-releasing properties. In conclusion, this preliminary study firstly demonstrates that ghrelin needs octanoylation to bind its hypothalamo-pituitary receptors, These receptors are the specific binding sites for GHS and their antagonists, as well as for SRIH analogs (vapreotide, and cortistatin-14), but not for native SRIH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据