4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Bonded atoms in sodium chloride - the information-theoretic approach

期刊

THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY ACCOUNTS
卷 105, 期 4-5, 页码 374-382

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s002140000248

关键词

atomic densities; atoms in molecules; charge transfer; chemical bond; entropy deficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The information-theoretic approach to the classical problem of partitioning the molecular electron density, rho, into densities {rho (alpha)} of the bonded atoms in molecules (AIM) is briefly summarized. The minimization of the missing information (entropy deficiency) between the isolated atom densities, {rho (0)(alpha)}, which define the promolecule density, rho (0) of the molecular density difference diagrams, Delta rho = rho - rho (0), and the AIM densities {rho (alpha)} in an exhaustive partitioning of rho gives rise to the stockholder scheme of Hirshfeld. A related nonexhaustive approach is also outlined and the polarized (closed) atom densities in a molecule are obtained by simultaneously minimizing their information distance with respect to both the isolated and the Hirshfeld atomic densities. For neutral molecules these schemes are unique when the ground-state densities of isolated atoms are selected as a reference. In an attempt to validate this natural choice two sets of the stockholder atoms in NaCl, resulting from the ground-state ionic (Na+ + Cl-) and atomic(Na + Cl) promolecule references, respectively, are compared and found to be almost identical. Small differences observed in the asymptotic, low-density regions are interpreted in terms of the reverse direction of the molecular charge transfer with respect to these initial promolecule states. A concept of the molecularly promoted reference corresponding to the promolecule density involving the statistical mixture of ionic and atomic densities, with the ensemble probabilities minimizing the deviations between the ensemble and molecular densities, is introduced.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据