4.5 Article

Synapse-specific contribution of the variation of transmitter concentration to the decay of inhibitory postsynaptic currents

期刊

BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 80, 期 3, 页码 1251-1261

出版社

BIOPHYSICAL SOCIETY
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76101-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS 30549] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Synaptic transmission is characterized by a remarkable trial-to-trial variability in the postsynaptic response, influencing the way in which information is processed in neuronal networks. This variability may originate from the probabilistic nature of quantal transmitter release, from the stochastic behavior of the receptors, or from the fluctuation of the transmitter concentration in the cleft. We combined nonstationary noise analysis and modeling techniques to estimate the contribution of transmitter fluctuation to miniature inhibitory postsynaptic current (mlPSC) variability. A substantial variability (similar to 30%) in mlPSC decay was found in all cell types studied (neocortical layer2/3 pyramidal cells, granule cells of the olfactory bulb, and interneurons of the cerebellar molecular layer). This large variability was not solely the consequence of the expression of multiple types of GABA, receptors, as a similar mlPSC decay variability was observed in cerebellar interneurons that express only a single type (alpha (1)beta (2)gamma (2)) of GABA(A) receptor. At large synapses on these cells, all variance in mlPSC decay could be accounted for by the stochastic behavior of similar to 36 pS channels, consistent with the conductance of alpha (1)beta (2)gamma (2) GABA(A) receptors at physiological temperatures. In contrast, at small synapses, a significant amount of variability in the synaptic cleft GABA transient had to be present to account for the additional variance in IPSC decay over that produced by stochastic channel openings. Thus, our results suggest a synapse-specific contribution of the variation of the spatiotemporal profile of GABA to the decay of IPSCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据