4.6 Article

Cytotoxicity of dental composite components and mercury compounds in lung cells

期刊

DENTAL MATERIALS
卷 17, 期 2, 页码 95-101

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00029-4

关键词

cytotoxicity; dental material; TEGDMA; HEMA; mercuric chloride; methylmercury chloride; lactatedehydrogenase; lung cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The effect of dental composite components triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA) and hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), as well as mercuric chloride (HgCl(2)) and methylmercury chloride (MeHgCl) was investigated on the release of lactatedehydrogenase (LDH) from alveolar epithelial lung cell lines in vitro. Methods: The confluent cell layers from the A549 (human, malignant) and the L2 cells (rat) were incubated with various concentrations of HEMA, TEGDMA, MeHgCl and HgCl(2) at 37 degreesC in 2% (v/v) CO(2) atmosphere for 8 h. In further experiments the L2 cells were incubated with the same compounds for 6-48 h. LDH release was measured and the values were expressed as percentage of the LDH content. The values were plotted on a concentration log-scale and the substance concentration at the maximum slope was assessed as effective concentration (EC(50)) Results: A significant (p < 0.05) increase in the LDH release was found in the L2 cells after g-h incubation with HEMA (4 mmol/l), TEGDMA (2 mmol/l), MeHgCl (0.01 mmol/l) and HgCl(2) (0.015 mmol/l), and in A549 cells with HEMA (14 mmol/l), TEGDMA (15 mmol/l), MeHgCl (0.15 mmol/l) and HgCl(2) (0.05 mmol/l), compared to controls. The EC(50) values from compounds in the L2 cells are shown in the following table (mean; sem in parentheses; n = 3-6; (#)n = 1). [GRAPHICS] Significance: The toxic effect of HgCl(2) and MeHgCl from the L2 cells was about 100-700-fold higher than of the dental composite components. A significant (p < 0.05) time dependent increase of toxicity was observed with TEGDMA, HEMA and MeHgCl. (C) 2001 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据