4.5 Article

An explanation for the inter-species variability of the photoprotective non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching in diatoms

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1827, 期 3, 页码 294-302

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.11.012

关键词

Diatom; Diatoxanthin; Ecophysiology; Photoprotection; Non-photochemical fluorescence quenching; Xanthophyll cycle

资金

  1. DFG-German Research Council [LA2368/2-1]
  2. DAAD-German Academic Exchange Agency
  3. CNRS-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  4. French consortium 'CPER Littoral'

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diatoms are a major group of microalgae whose photosynthetic productivity supports a substantial part of the aquatic primary production. In their natural environment they have to cope with strong fluctuations of the light climate which can be harmful for photosynthesis. In order to prevent the damage of their photosynthetic machinery, diatoms use fast regulatory processes among which the non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll a fluorescence (NPQ) is one of the most important In a previous work, we highlighted differences in the kinetics and extent of NPQ between diatom species/strains originating from different aquatic habitats. We proposed that the NPQ differences observed between strains/species could potentially participate to their ecophysiological adaptation to the light environment of their respective natural habitat In order to better understand the molecular bases of such differences, we compared the NPQ features of four strains/species of diatoms known for their NPQ discrepancy. We could identify new spectroscopic fingerprints concomitant to NPQ and the related xanthophyll cycle. These fingerprints helped us propose a molecular explanation for the NPQ differences observed between the diatom species/strains examined. The present work further strengthens the potential role of NPQ in the ecophysiology of diatoms. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据