4.7 Article

Oxidation of pyrite and iron sulfide by manganese dioxide in marine sediments

期刊

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
卷 65, 期 6, 页码 915-922

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-7037(00)00589-5

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oxidation of pyrite (FeS2) under anaerobic conditions in marine sediments is experimentally shown for the first time. In slurry experiments with (FeS2)-Fe-55 and a MnO2 rich marine sediment an oxidation of (FeS2)-Fe-55 was detected which decreased with depth and decreasing concentration of MnO2 in the sediment. FeS2 and iron sulfide (FeS) were oxidized chemically at pH 8 by MnO2 but not by nitrate or amorphic Fe(III) oxide. Elemental sulfur and sulfate were the only products of FeS oxidation, whereas FeS2 was oxidized to a variety of sulfur compounds, mainly sulfate plus intermediates such as thiosulfate, trithionate, tetrathionate. and pentathionate. Thiosulfate was oxidized by MnO2 to tetrathionate while other intermediates were oxidized to sulfate. The reaction products indicate that FeS2 was oxidized via the Thiosulfatemechanism and FeS via the Polysulfide-mechanism (Schippers and Sand, 1999). The processes are summarized by the overall equations: FeS2 + 7.5 MnO2 + 11 H+ --> Fe(OH)(3) + 2 SO42- + 7.5 Mn2+ + 4 H2O (1) FeS + 1.5 MnO2 + 3 H+ --> Fe(OH)(3) + S-o + 1.5 Mn2+ (2) For FeS2 oxidation the reaction rates related to the mineral surface area were 1.02 and 1.12 nmol m(-2) s(-1) for total dissolved S and total dissolved Fe, respectively. Since these values are in the same range as previously published rates for the oxidation of FeS2 by Fe(II), and since Fe(III) is a well-known oxidant for FeS2 even at circumneutral pH, Fe(III) is assumed also to be the oxidant for FeS and FeS2 in the presence of MnO2. At the iron sulfide surface, Fe(III) is reduced to Fe(II) which is reoxidized to Fe(III) by MnO2. Thus, an Fe(II)/Fe(III) shuttle should transport electrons between the surfaces of the two solid compounds. Copyright (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据