4.0 Article

Postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy and the risk of Alzheimer disease

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 58, 期 3, 页码 435-440

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.58.3.435

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG08122, AG05134] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS017950, NS17950] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Previous studies have examined the relation between postmenopausal estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) and the risk of Alzheimer disease (AD). The findings have been inconsistent, since some studies have been interpreted as showing a protective effect while others have reported no Effect. Objective: To determine whether exposure to ERT is associated with a reduced risk of AD. Design: Population-based nested case-control study. Setting: The United Kingdom-based General Practice Research Database. Patients: The base cohort consisted of women who were recipients of ERT (n=112481) and a similar cohort of women who did not use estrogens (n=108925). The 2 cohorts were restricted to women born on or before January 1, 1950. From the 2 cohorts, we identified and verified 59 newly diagnosed cases of AD and 221 matched control subjects. Main Outcome Measure: Prior and current use of ERT in cases compared with controls. Results: Among the 59 newly diagnosed cases of AD, 15 (25%) were current estrogen users, while among the controls, 53 (24%) were current users. The adjusted odds ratio comparing all current estrogen recipients with nonrecipients was 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-2.37). In estrogen users who took the drug for 5 years or longer compared with nonusers, the odds ratio was 1.05 (95% confidence interval, 0.32-3.44). Odds ratios were similar for estrogen recipients who received estrogens alone and recipients who received combined estrogen-progestin treatment. Conclusion: The use of ERT in women after the onset of menopause was not associated with a reduced risk of developing AD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据