4.5 Article

Photosynthetic electron flow to oxygen and diffusion of hydrogen peroxide through the chloroplast envelope via aquaporins

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1817, 期 8, 页码 1314-1321

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.02.036

关键词

Chloroplast; Thylakoid; Superoxide radical; Hydrogen peroxide; Aquaporin; Carbonic anhydrase

资金

  1. Incoming Marie Curie Fellowship
  2. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [08-04-0141]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Light-induced generation of superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide in isolated thylakoids has been studied with a lipophilic spin probe, cyclic hydroxylamine 1-hydroxy-4-isobutyramido-2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidinium (TMT-H) to detect superoxide radicals, and the spin trap alpha-(4-pyridyl-1-oxide)-N-tert-butylnitron (4-POBN) to detect hydrogen peroxide-derived hydroxyl radicals. Accumulation of the radical products of the above reactions has been followed using electron paramagnetic resonance. It is found that the increased production of superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide in higher light is due to the enhanced production of these species within the thylakoid membrane, rather than outside the membrane. Fluorescent probe Amplex red, which forms fluorescent product, resorufin, in the reaction with hydrogen peroxide, has been used to detect hydrogen peroxide outside isolated chloroplasts using confocal microscopy. Resorufin fluorescence outside the chloroplasts is found to be suppressed by 60% in the presence of the inhibitor of aquaporins, acetazolamide (AZA), indicating that hydrogen peroxide can diffuse through the chloroplast envelope aquaporins. It is demonstrated that AZA also inhibits carbonic anhydrase activity of the isolated envelope. We put forward a hypothesis that carbonic anhydrase presumably can be attached to the envelope aquaporins. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Photosynthesis Research for Sustainability: from Natural to Artificial. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据