4.2 Article

Transgenic mouse model for familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with superoxide dismutase-1 mutation

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY
卷 21, 期 1, 页码 82-92

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2001.00361.x

关键词

amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; carbonyls; motor neuron degeneration; oxidative stress; superoxide dismutase; transgenic mice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) with mutations in the gene for superoxide dismutase-1 (SOD1) is clinicopathologically reproduced by transgenic mice expressing mutant forms of SOD1 detectable in familial ALS patients. Motor neuron degeneration associated with SOD1 mutation has been thought to result from a novel neurotoxicity of mutant SOD1, but not from a reduction in activity of this enzyme, based on autosomal dominant transmission of SOD1 mutant familial ALS and its transgenic mouse model, clinical severity of the ALS patients independent to enzyme activity, no ALS-like disease in SOD1 knockout or wild-type SOD1-over-expressing mice, and clinicopathological severity of mutant SOD1 transgenic mice dependent on transgene copy numbers. Proposed mechanisms of motor neuron de-generation such as oxidative injury, peroxynitrite toxicity, cytoskeletal disorganization, glutamate excitotoxicity, disrupted calcium homeostasis, SOD1 aggregation, car-bonyl stress and apoptosis have been discussed. Intracy-toplasmic vacuoles, indicative of increased oxidative damage to the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum, in the neuropil and motor neurons appear in high expressors of mutant SOD1 transgenic mice but not in low expressors of the mice or familial ALS patients, suggesting that overexpression of mutant SOD1 in mice may enhance oxidative stress generation from this enzyme. Thus, transgenic mice carrying small transgene copy numbers of mutant SOD1 would provide a beneficial animal model for SOD1 mutant familial ALS. Such a model would contribute to elucidating the pathomechanism of this disease and establishing new therapeutic agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据