4.5 Article

An automated multidimensional thin film stretching device for the generation of anisotropic polymeric micro- and nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 103, 期 8, 页码 2747-2757

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.35399

关键词

anisotropic; particle shape; biomimetic; automation; microparticles; nanoparticles

资金

  1. NIH [R01-EB016721]
  2. NIH Cancer Nanotechnology Training Center [R25CA153952]
  3. JHU Institute for Nanobiotechnology
  4. Johns Hopkins University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Anisotropic polymeric particles are of growing interest for biomaterials applications due to their unique properties. These include the ability for these particles to evade nonspecific cellular uptake and to have enhanced targeted cellular uptake and interaction. One of the most widely used methods for generating anisotropic polymeric particles is the thin film stretching procedure. Despite its theoretical simplicity, this procedure, as it has been implemented to date, can be difficult due to the inconsistent nature of the manual operation of machinery used to stretch the film. We have constructed an automated thin film stretcher for control over biomaterials via thin film stretching in 1D and 2D and as a result, have enabled precise generation of anisotropic polymeric particles. We demonstrate that this device can be utilized to produce anisotropic biodegradable particles of different size, shape, and material consistency. Furthermore, we show that this machine has enabled the scaled up and rapid production of anisotropic polymeric particles, including polymeric microparticles that mimic the shape of red blood cells. Further application of this automated thin film stretching device could allow for significant impact to diverse biomaterial and biomedical applications such as biomimetic particles for immunoengineering and long-circulating particles for controlled release of drugs. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A: 103A: 2747-2757, 2015.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据