4.2 Article

Effect of Lazaroid U-74389G on pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs

期刊

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY
卷 14, 期 2, 页码 83-92

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/08941930152024200

关键词

cytokine; interleukin-1 beta; Lazaroid U-74389G; lipid peroxidation; pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lipid peroxidation induced by oxygen free radicals is a contributing factor in ischemia-reperfusion injury. Lazaroid U-74389G (LAZ-G) is a group of new synthetic 21-aminosteroids and inhibits iron-dependent lipid peroxidation. We investigated the effects of LAZ-G on pulmonary ischemia-reperfusion injury in dogs. Twenty dogs were divided into three groups. In the LAZ-G group (n = 6), LAZ-G was administered 15 min before ischemia. In the St group (n = 5), methylprednisolone was injected 15 min before ischemia and 15 min before reperfusion. In the control group (n = 9), the vehicle of Lazaroid was injected 15 min before ischemia. Warm ischemia was induced for 3 h by clamping the pulmonary artery and veins. Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), cardiac output (CO), left pulmonary vascular resistance (L-PVR), and blood levels of interleukin-1 beta mRNA were measured. The lung specimen was harvested for histologic study and polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) counting. SaO(2) levels at 30 min and 2 h after reperfusion were significantly higher in the LAZ-G group than in the control group. After 30 min of reperfusion, CO was significantly better in the LAZ-G group than in the St and control groups, and the L-PVR level was significantly lower in the LAZ-G group than in the control group. Survival rates were significantly better in the LAZ-G group than in the control group. Histological damages and PMNs infiltration were more severe in the control group than in the LAZ-G group. Interleukin-1 beta mRNA levels were lower in the LAZ-G group than in the control group. Lazaroid U-74389G appears to generate a protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury of the lung.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据