4.5 Article

A minimal phycobilisome: Fusion and chromophorylation of the truncated core-membrane linker and phycocyanin

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1817, 期 7, 页码 1030-1036

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2012.03.018

关键词

Photosynthesis; Phycobilisome; Core-membrane linker; Phycocyanin; Phycocyanobilin; Phycoerythrobilin

资金

  1. China-Israel Joint Research Program
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31110103912, 21072068]
  3. Huazhong Agricultural University Scientific & Technological Self-innovation Foundation [2010SC08, 2009SC010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phycobilisomes, the light-harvesting antennas in cyanobacteria and red algae, consist of an allophycocyanin core that is attached to the membrane via a core-membrane linker, and rods comprised of phycocyanin and often also phycoerythrin or phycoerythrocyanin. Phycobiliproteins show excellent energy transfer among the chromophores that renders them biomarkers with large Stokes-shifts absorbing over most of the visible spectrum and into the near infrared. Their application is limited, however, due to covalent binding of the chromophores and by solubility problems. We report construction of a water-soluble minimal chromophore-binding unit of the red-absorbing and fluorescing core-membrane linker. This was fused to minimal chromophorebinding units of phycocyanin. After double chromophorylation with phycocyanobilin, in E. coli, the fused phycobiliproteins absorbed light in the range of 610-660 nm, and fluoresced at similar to 670 nm, similar to phycobilisomes devoid of phycoerythr(ocyan)in. The fused phycobiliprotein could also be doubly chromophorylated with phycoerythrobilin, resulting in a chromoprotein absorbing around 540-575 nm, and fluorescing at similar to 585 nm. The broad absorptions and the large Stokes shifts render these chromoproteins candidates for imaging; they may also be helpful in studying phycobilisome assembly. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据