4.5 Article

The formation of the split EPR signal from the S-3 state of Photosystem II does not involve primary charge separation

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1807, 期 1, 页码 11-21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.09.006

关键词

Photosystem II; EPR; S-3 state; Near-infrared; Split signal

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Swedish Energy Agency
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  4. EU [212508]
  5. Carl Tryggers Foundation for Scientific Research
  6. Nordic Energy Research Program [06-Hydr-C13]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metalloradical EPR signals have been found in intact Photosystem II at cryogenic temperatures. They reflect the light-driven formation of the tyrosine Z radical (Y-z(center dot)) in magnetic interaction with the CaMn4 cluster in a particular S state. These so-called split EPR signals, induced at cryogenic temperatures, provide means to study the otherwise transient Y-z(center dot) and to probe the S states with EPR spectroscopy. In the S-0 and S-1 states, the respective split signals are induced by illumination of the sample in the visible light range only. In the S-3 state the split EPR signal is induced irrespective of illumination wavelength within the entire 415-900 nm range (visible and near-IR region) [Su, J. H., Havelius, K. G. V., Ho, F. M., Han, G., Mamedov, F., and Styring, S. (2007) Biochemistry 46. 10703-10712]. An important question is whether a single mechanism can explain the induction of the Split S-3 signal across the entire wavelength range or whether wavelength-dependent mechanisms are required. In this paper we confirm that the Y-z(center dot) radical formation in the S-1 state, reflected in the Split S-1 signal, is driven by P680-centered charge separation. The situation in the S-3 state is different. In Photosystem II centers with pre-reduced quinone A (Q(A)), where the P680-centered charge separation is blocked, the Split S-3 EPR signal could still be induced in the majority of the Photosystem II centers using both visible and NIR (830 nm) light. This shows that P680-centered charge separation is not involved. The amount of oxidized electron donors and reduced electron acceptors (Q(A)(-)) was well correlated after visible light illumination at cryogenic temperatures in the S-1 state. This was not the case in the S-3 state, where the Split S-3 EPR signal was formed in the majority of the centers in a pathway other than P680-centered charge separation. Instead, we propose that one mechanism exists over the entire wavelength interval to drive the formation of the Split S-3 signal. The origin for this, probably involving excitation of one of the Mn ions in the CaMn4 cluster in Photosystem II, is discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据