4.5 Review

Metabolic management of brain cancer

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1807, 期 6, 页码 577-594

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.08.009

关键词

Angiogenesis; Apoptosis; Invasion; Caloric restriction; Glioma; Inflammation; Ketone bodies; Metabolic control analysis; Vascularity

资金

  1. NIH [HD-39722, NS-55195, CA-102135]
  2. American Institute of Cancer Research
  3. Boston College

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Malignant brain tumors are a significant health problem in children and adults. Conventional therapeutic approaches have been largely unsuccessful in providing long-term management As primarily a metabolic disease, malignant brain cancer can be managed through changes in metabolic environment. In contrast to normal neurons and glia, which readily transition to ketone bodies (beta-hydroxybutyrate) for energy under reduced glucose, malignant brain tumors are strongly dependent on glycolysis for energy. The transition from glucose to ketone bodies as a major energy source is an evolutionary conserved adaptation to food deprivation that permits the survival of normal cells during extreme shifts in nutritional environment. Only those cells with a flexible genome and normal mitochondria can effectively transition from one energy state to another. Mutations restrict genomic and metabolic flexibility thus making tumor cells more vulnerable to energy stress than normal cells. We propose an alternative approach to brain cancer management that exploits the metabolic flexibility of normal cells at the expense of the genetically defective and metabolically challenged tumor cells. This approach to brain cancer management is supported from recent studies in mice and humans treated with calorie restriction and the ketogenic diet Issues of implementation and use protocols are presented for the metabolic management of brain cancer. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Bioenergetics of Cancer. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据