4.5 Article

Characterization of photosystem II in transgenic tobacco plants with decreased iron superoxide dismutase

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1807, 期 4, 页码 391-403

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2011.01.006

关键词

Chlorophyll fluorescence; Iron superoxide dismutase; Photosystem II; Photoinhibition; Transformed tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum); Thermoluminescence

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30971717]
  2. State Key Basic Research and Development Plan of China [2009CB118503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron superoxide dismutases (FeSODs) play an important role in preventing the oxidative damage associated with photosynthesis. To investigate the mechanisms of FeSOD in protection against photooxidative stress, we obtained transgenic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants with severely decreased FeSOD by using a gene encoding tobacco chloroplastic FeSOD for the RNAi construct. Transgenic plants were highly sensitive to photooxidative stress and accumulated increased levels of O-2(center dot-) under normal light conditions. Spectroscopic analysis and electron transport measurements showed that PSII activity was significantly reduced in transgenic plants. Flash-induced fluorescence relaxation and thermoluminescence measurements revealed that there was a slow electron transfer between Q(A) and Q(B) and decreased redox potential of Q(B) in transgenic plants, whereas the donor side function of PSII was not affected. Immunoblot and blue native gel analyses showed that PSII protein accumulation was also decreased in transgenic plants. PSII photodamage and D1 protein degradation under high light treatment was increased in transgenic plants, whereas the PSII repair was not affected, indicating that the stability of the PSII complex was decreased in transgenic plants. The results in this study suggest that FeSOD plays an important role in maintaining PSII function by stabilizing PSII complexes in tobacco plants. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据