4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Recent progress in elucidating the molecular mechanism of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore

期刊

BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-BIOENERGETICS
卷 1777, 期 7-8, 页码 946-952

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2008.03.009

关键词

adenine nucleotide translocase; cyclophilin-D; mitochondrial phosphate carrier; permeability transition; ischaemia; reperfusion; oxidative stress; calcium

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [RG/03/002, FS/04/043, RG/03/002/15663] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) plays a key role in cell death, especially necrosis, and mediates the injury tissues such as the heart and brain experience following ischaemia and reperfusion. However, the molecular identity of the MPTP remains uncertain. Knockout studies have confirmed a role for cyclophilin-D (CyP-D) in pore opening, probably mediated by its peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase activity that facilitates a conformational change in an inner membrane protein. However, similar knockout studies have cast doubt on the central role of the adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT), previously regarded as a leading contender for the membrane component that forms the transmembrane channel of the MPTP. Here we review the evidence for and against a role for the ANT in MPTP opening and conclude that it usually plays a regulatory role rather than provide the transmembrane pore component. We suggest that the protein fulfilling the latter role is the mitochondrial phosphate carrier (PiC) and summarise recent evidence in support of this Proposal. Our data are consistent with a model for the MPTP in which a calcium-triggered conformational change of the PiC, facilitated by CyP-D, induces pore opening. We propose that this is enhanced by an association of the PiC with the c conformation of the ANT. Agents that modulate pore opening may act on either or both the PiC and the ANT. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据