4.7 Article

Profiles of dark haloes: evolution, scatter and environment

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04068.x

关键词

galaxies : formation; galaxies : structure; cosmology : theory; dark matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study dark matter halo density profiles in a high-resolution N-body simulation of a Lambda CDM cosmology. Our statistical sample contains similar to 5000 haloes in the range 10(11)-10(14) h(-1) M., and the resolution allows a study of subhaloes inside host haloes. The profiles are parametrized by an NFW form with two parameters, an inner radius r(s) and a virial radius R-vir, and we define the halo concentration c(vir) = R(vir)r(s). First, we find that, for a given halo mass, the redshift dependence of the median concentration is c(vir) proportional to (1 + z)(-1). This corresponds to r(s)(z) similar to constant, and is contrary to earlier suspicions that c(vir) does not vary much with redshift. The implications are that high-redshift galaxies are predicted to be more extended and dimmer than expected before. Secondly, we find that the scatter in halo profiles is large, with a 1 sigma Delta (log c(vir)) = 0.18 at a given mass, corresponding to a scatter in maximum rotation velocities of DeltaV(max)/V-max = 0.12. We discuss implications for modelling the Tully-Fisher relation, which has a smaller reported intrinsic scatter. Thirdly, subhaloes and haloes in dense environments tend to be more concentrated than isolated haloes, and show a larger scatter. These results suggest that c(vir) is an essential parameter for the theory of galaxy modelling, and we briefly discuss implications for the universality of the Tully-Fisher relation, the formation of low surface brightness galaxies, and the origin of the Hubble sequence. We present an improved analytic treatment of halo formation that fits the measured relations between halo parameters and their redshift dependence, and can thus serve semi-analytic studies of galaxy formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据