4.7 Article

Presentation of venous endothelial function in the forearm venous capacitance bed of patients with chronic heart failure despite arterial endothelial dysfunction

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
卷 37, 期 4, 页码 1062-1068

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0735-1097(01)01142-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess whether endothelial dysfunction occurs in the forearm venous capacitance bed of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and to determine the role of nitric oxide (NO) in modulating venous tone. BACKGROUND Control of venous tone is crucially important in CHF. More than 70% of blood volume lies in thr venous capacitance beds. Therefore, small changes in venous tone may markedly affect cardiac filling pressures and cardiac output. METHODS Venous tone was measured using radionuclide forearm venous plethysmography in 24 patients with CHF and 16 age-matched controls. The effect of basal NO activity on venous tone was assessed by infusing N-monomethyl-L-arginine 12 mg/min and stimulated NO using carbachol 15 mug/min. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was assessed by ultrasonic wall-tracking. RESULTS Blockade of basal NO release caused a significant and similar venoconstriction in patients (9.6 +/- 1.8%, p < 0.01) and controls (6.6 1.7%, p < 0.01). Carbachol-induced venodilation was significant and similar in patients (36.8 3.9%, p < 0.001) and controls (40.7 3.9%, p < 0.001). Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation was impaired in patients compared with controls (2.0 0.6% vs. 7.5 +/- 2.5%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our data indicate that, despite marked impairment uf the function of the arterial endothelium, there is preservation of both basal and stimulated NO release in the forearm venous capacitance bed. This may provide important insights into mechanisms of endothelial dysfunction in CHF and thr potential for novel therapy. (J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;37:1062-8) (C) 2001 by the American College of Cardiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据