4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Human thymus contains 2 distinct dendritic cell populations

期刊

BLOOD
卷 97, 期 6, 页码 1733-1741

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood.V97.6.1733

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 2 distinct populations of mature dendritic cells (DCs) were identified in the human thymus, The major population is CD11b(-), CD11c(+), and CD45RO(low) and does not express myeloid-related markers. It displays all the characteristics of mature DCs with a typical dendritic morphology, high surface levels of HLA-DR, CD40, CD83, and CD86, and expression of DC-lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein messenger RNA (mRNA), In addition, CD11b(-) thymic DCs do not express macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) mRNA, but express thymus-expressed chemokine (TECK) mRNA and are able to secrete bioactive interleukin 12 (IL-12) upon stimulation. In contrast, the minor and variable thymic DC population is CD11b(+), CD11c(high), and CD45RO(high) and comprises CD83(+)CD14(-) mature and CD83(-)CD14(+) immature DCs, It expresses macrophage-colony stimulating factor receptor, MIP-1 alpha mRNA and high amounts of decysin mRNA after CD40 activation, but does not express TECK and is a weak bioactive IL-12 producer. Also identified were the IL-3R alpha (high) plasmacytoid cells, which are present in the thymic cortex and medulla, Upon culture with IL-3, granulocyte/macrophage-colony stimulating factor, and CD40 ligand, the plasmacytoid cells can adopt a phenotype resembling that of freshly isolated CD11b(-) thymic DCs, However, these plasmacytoid-derived DCs fail to secrete bioactive IL-12; therefore, conclusions cannot be made about a direct relation between thymic plasmacytoid cells and CD11b(-) DCs, Whereas CD11b(+) thymic DCs appear to be related to tonsillar germinal-center DCs, the major CD11b(-)IL-15-secreting human thymus DC population has similarities to mouse CD11b(-)CD8(+) DCs, (Blood, 2001;97:1733-1741) (C) 2001 by The American Society of Hematology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据