4.8 Article

Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 103, 期 11, 页码 1529-1534

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.11.1529

关键词

coronary disease; calcium; risk factors

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [N01-HC-38038] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR/AG 41398] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-The impact of abdominal arterial calcific deposits on the prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) over a long follow-up interval deserves greater scrutiny. Methods and Results-Lateral lumbar radiographs were studied as a predictor of incident coronary heart disease (CHD), CVD, and CVD mortality in 1049 men and 1466 women (mean age, 61 years) who were followed from 1967 to 1989. Anterior and posterior wall calcific deposits in the aorta at the level of the first through fourth lumbar vertebrae were graded according to increasing severity using a previously validated rating scale for abdominal aortic calcium (AAC) that ranges from 0 to 24 points. There were 454 cases of CHD, 709 cases of CVD, and 365 CVD deaths. Proportional hazards logistic regression was used to test for associations between AAC and later events after adjustment for age, cigarette use, diabetes mellitus, systolic blood pressure, left ventricular hypertrophy, body mass index, cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol. In comparisons with the lowest AAC tertile, the multivariate age-adjusted relative risks (RR) for CVD were increased in tertile 2 (men: RR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02 to 1.74; women: RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.95 to 1.65) and tertile 3 (men: RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.25 to 2.27; women: RR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.33 to 2.38). Similar results were obtained with CHD and CVD mortality. Conclusions-AAC deposits, detected by lateral lumbar radiograms, are a marker of subdinical atherosclerotic disease and an independent predictor of subsequent vascular morbidity and mortality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据