4.7 Article

Temperature tomography of the soft X-ray corona: Measurements of electron densities, temperatures, and differential emission measure distributions above the limb

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 550, 期 1, 页码 475-492

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/319711

关键词

Sun : atmosphere; Sun : corona; Sun : X-rays; gamma rays

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze long-exposure and off-pointing Yohkoh/SXT data of the solar corona observed on 1992 August 26. We develop a new (temperature) tomography method that is based on a forward-fitting method of a four-parameter model to the observed soft X-ray fluxes F(1)(h) and F(2)(h) of two SXT wave-length filters as a function of height h. The model is defined in terms of a differential emission measure (DEM) distribution dEM(h, T)/dT, which includes also a temperature dependence of density scale heights lambda (n)(T) = q(lambda) lambda (T) and allows us to quantify deviations (q(lambda)not equal1) from hydrostatic equilibrium This parametrization facilitates a proper line-of-sight integration and relates the widely used filter ratio temperature T(FR) to the peak of the DEM distribution. A direct consequence of the multi-scale height atmosphere is that the filter ratio temperature T(FR)(h) is predicted to increase with height, even if all magnetic field lines are isothermal. Our model fitting reveals that coronal holes and quiet-Sun regions are in perfect hydrostatic equilibrium but that coronal streamers have a scale height that exceeds the hydrostatic scale height by a factor of up to which underscores the dynamic nature of coronal q(lambda)less than or similar to2.3, streamers. Our density measurements in coronal holes are slightly lower than most of the white-light polarized brightness inversions and seem to come closer to the requirements of solar wind models. Our DEM model provides also a physical framework for the semiempirical Baumbach-Allen formula and quantifies the temperature ranges and degree of hydrostaticity of the K, L, and F coronae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据