4.6 Article

Recent trends in weather and seasonal cycles:: An analysis of daily data from Europe and China

期刊

JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES
卷 106, 期 D6, 页码 5123-5138

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2000JD900705

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A wavelet analysis is conducted to investigate daily variability (DV, timescales of less than 3 days), weekly (weather) variability (WV, timescales of 5 days up to 2 months), and seasonal variability (SV, timescales of 8 to 17 months) in five temperature series from Europe and China and two westerly indices for the European/North Atlantic sector back to-the 18th century. DV exhibits local features so that it is sensitive to any inhomogeneity in each series. Analysis of DV shows the potential for further homogenization of the data and suggests that for the present study, daily series are only truly homogeneous back to the 19th century. WV is responsible for extremes of large-scale cold/warm variations in the daily series and explains about 80% of the total variance. WV is found to be significantly weaker in northern Europe by 7-10% during warming periods, especially for winter and autumn, but summer temperature correlates positively with WV, with a maximum coefficient of 0.52 for central England. This indicates that for warming periods, WV is reduced in the cold season, but is potentially increased in the warm season. The principal timescale of weather, about 16 days in Europe and 11 days in China, does not exhibit significant trends. Changes in SV from cold to warm periods often result in weaker seasonal cycles, with an unprecedented reduction of up to 3 degreesC at St. Petersburg during the warm period since 1988. The analysis of the westerly indices supports the recent unusually anomalous seasonal cycles, with stronger winter westerlies over the northern Atlantic and Europe. The trends in WV of the westerly indices coincide with the temperature data, implying they are responsible for the large-scale changes over northern Europe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据