4.4 Article

Pulse Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Studies of the Interaction of Methanol with the S2 State of the Mn4O5Ca Cluster of Photosystem II

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 53, 期 50, 页码 7914-7928

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi501323h

关键词

-

资金

  1. Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences of the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-FG02-11ER16282]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The binding of the substrate analogue methanol to the catalytic Mn4CaO5 cluster of the water-oxidizing enzyme photosystem II is known to alter the electronic structure properties of the oxygen-evolving complex without retarding O-2-evolution under steady-state illumination conditions. We report the binding mode of C-13-labeled methanol determined using 9.4 GHz (X-band) hyperfine sublevel-correlation (HYSCORE) and 34 GHz (Q-band) electron spin-echo electron nuclear double resonance (ESE-ENDOR) spectroscopies. These results are compared to analogous experiments on a mixed-valence Mn(III)Mn(IV) complex (2-OH-3,5-Cl-2-salpn)(2)Mn(III)Mn-(IV) (salpn = N,N'-bis(3,5-dichlorosalicylidene)-1,3-diamino-2-hydroxypropane) in which methanol ligates to the Mn(III) ion (Larson et al. (1992) J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 6263). In the mixed-valence Mn(III,IV) complex, the hyperfine coupling to the C-13 of the bound methanol (Aiso = 0.65 MHz, T = 1.25 MHz) is appreciably larger than that observed for C-13 methanol associated with the Mn4CaO5 cluster poised in the S-2 state, where only a weak dipolar hyperfine interaction (Aiso = 0.05 MHz, T = 0.27 MHz) is observed. An evaluation of the C-13 hyperfine interaction using the X-ray structure coordinates of the Mn4CaO5 cluster indicates that methanol does not bind as a terminal ligand to any of the manganese ions in the oxygen-evolving complex. We favor methanol binding in place of a water ligand to the Ca2+ in the Mn4CaO5 cluster or in place of one of the waters that form hydrogen bonds with the oxygen bridges of the cluster.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据