4.2 Review

The vesiculo-vacuolar organelle (VVO): A new endothelial cell permeability organelle

期刊

JOURNAL OF HISTOCHEMISTRY & CYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 49, 期 4, 页码 419-431

出版社

HISTOCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1177/002215540104900401

关键词

vesiculo-vacuolar organelle; endothelial cell; permeability; vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor; venules; tumor biology; allergic inflammation; mast cell; histamine; electron microscopy

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-44066, AI-33372] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A newly defined endothelial cell permeability structure, termed the vesiculo-vacuolar organelle (WO), has been identified in the microvasculature that accompanies tumors, in venules associated with allergic inflammation, and in the endothelia of normal venules. This organelle provides the major route of extravasation of macromolecules at sites of increased vascular permeability induced by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor (VPF/VEGF), serotonin, and histamine in animal models. Continuity of these large sessile structures between the vascular lumen and the extracellular space has been demonstrated in kinetic studies with ultrastructural electron-dense tracers, by direct observation of tilted electron micrographs, and by ultrathin serial sections with three-dimensional computer reconstructions. Ultrastructural enzyme-affinity cytochemical and immunocytochemical studies have identified histamine and VPF/VEGF bound to VVOs in vivo in animal models in which these mediators of permeability are released from mast cells and tumor cells, respectively. The high-affinity receptor for VPF/VEGF, VEGFR-2, was localized to VVOs and their substructural components by pre-embedding ultrastructural immunonanogold and immunoperoxidase techniques. Similar methods were used to localize caveolin and vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP) to VVOs and caveolae, indicating a possible commonality of formation and function of VVOs to caveolae.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据