4.4 Article

Multiple and Cooperative Binding of Fluorescence Light-up Probe Thioflavin T with Human Telomere DNA G-Quadruplex

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 33, 页码 5620-5628

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi4006072

关键词

-

资金

  1. Kurata Memorial Hitachi Science and Technology Foundation
  2. Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique-FNRS [FRFC 2.4528.11]
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  4. Scientific Research on Innovative Areas Nanomedicine Molecular Science [2306]
  5. Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan
  6. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24107525, 25460708] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thioflavin T (ThT), a typical probe for protein fibrils, also binds human telomeric G-quadruplexes with a fluorescent light-up signal change and high specificity against DNA duplexes. Cell penetration and low cytotoxicity of fibril probes having been widely established, modifying ThT and other fibril probes is an attractive means of generating new G-quadruplex ligands. Thus, elucidating the binding mechanism is important for the design of new drugs and fluorescent probes based on ThT. Here, we investigated the binding mechanism of ThT with several variants of the human telomeric sequence in the presence of monovalent cations. Fluorescence titrations and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analyses demonstrated that each G-quadruplex unit cooperatively binds to several ThT molecules. ThT brightly fluoresces when a single ligand is bound to the G-quadruplex and is quenched as ligand binding stoichiometry increases. Both the light-up signal and the dissociation constants are exquisitely sensitive to the base sequence and to the G-quadruplex structure. These results are crucial for the sensible design and interpretation of G-quadruplex detection assays using fluorescent ligands in general and ThT in particular.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据