4.7 Article

Allergy caused by ingestion of persimmon (Diospyros kaki):: Detection of specific IgE and cross-reactivity to profilin and carbohydrate determinants

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 107, 期 4, 页码 718-723

出版社

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1067/mai.2001.113568

关键词

carbohydrate determinants; cross-reactivity; double -blind; placebo-controlled; food-challenge; allergy; Diospyros kaki; persimmon; profilin; IgE

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Allergy to persimmon (Diospyros kaki) is very rare and not yet confirmed by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled, food-challenge (DBPCFC), Thus far, specific IgE to this fruit and cross-reactivity to pollen and other foods has not been determined. Objective: The objective was to confirm allergy to persimmon in 3 patients with an according personal history and to characterize allergens and cross-reactivity of specific IgE antibodies to pollen and food allergens, One patient reacted with pruritus, penis edema, urticaria, and asthma; the second reacted with nausea and vomitus; and the third reacted with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, and stomachache after ingestion of persimmon. Methods: Patients underwent skin prick testing with routine allergens, latex, persimmon, and other foods. Allergy to persimmon was confirmed by means of a DBPCFC, Specific serum IgE levels were measured with CAP-FEIA and the enzyme allergosorbent test (EAST) method, EAST and immunoblot inhibitions were carried out with persimmon; birch, grass, and ragweed pollen; latex; and N-glycans as inhibitors. Results: All patients had positive skin test responses, DBPCFC and specific IgE assays to persimmon, Blot and EAST inhibition assays revealed IgE to cross-reactive profilin in one patient and IgE to cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants in all patients. Conclusions: This is the first report on 3 cases of allergy to persimmon verified by means of DBPCFC and detection of specific IgE, The sensitization is due to cross-reactive profilin and carbohydrate determinants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据