4.4 Article

Interaction of 14-3-3ζ with Microtubule-Associated Protein Tau within Alzheimer's Disease Neurofibrillary Tangles

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 37, 页码 6445-6455

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi400442d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Research
  2. Alzheimer's Society of Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the presence of abnormal, straight filaments and paired helical filaments (PHFs) that are coated with amorphous aggregates. When PHFs are treated with alkali, they untwist and form filaments with a ribbonlike morphology. Tau protein is the major component of all of these ultrastructures. 14-3-3 zeta is present in NFTs and is significantly upregulated in AD brain. The molecular basis of the association of 14-3-3 zeta within NFTs and the pathological significance of its association are not known. In this study, we have found that 14-3-3 zeta is copurified and co-immunoprecipitates with tau from NFTs of AD brain extract. In vitro, tau binds to both phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated tau. When incubated with 14-3-3 zeta, tau forms amorphous aggregates, single-stranded, straight filaments, ribbonlike filaments, and PHF-like filaments, all of which resemble the corresponding ultrastructures found in AD brain. Immuno-electron microscopy determined that both tau and 14-3-3 zeta are present in these ultrastructures and that they are formed in an incubation time-dependent manner. Amorphous aggregates are formed first. As the incubation time increases, the size of amorphous aggregates increases and they are incorporated into single-stranded filaments. Single-stranded filaments laterally associate to form double-stranded, ribbonlike, and PHF-like filaments. Both tau and phosphorylated tau aggregate in a similar manner when they are incubated with 14-3-3 zeta. Our data suggest that 14-3-3 zeta has a role in the fibrillization of tau in AD brain, and that tau phosphorylation does not affect 14-3-3 zeta-induced tau aggregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据