4.4 Article

The BRICHOS Domain, Amyloid Fibril Formation, and Their Relationship

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 52, 期 43, 页码 7523-7531

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi400908x

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amyloid diseases are defined by tissue deposition of insoluble, fibrillar beta-sheet polymers of specific proteins, but it appears that toxic oligomeric species rather than the fibrils are the main cause of tissue degeneration. Many proteins can form amyloid-like fibrils in vitro, but only similar to 30 proteins have been found to cause mammalian amyloid disease, suggesting that physiological mechanisms that protect against amyloid formation exist. The transmembrane region of lung surfactant protein C precursor (proSP-C) forms amyloid-like fibrils in vitro, and SP-C amyloid has been found in lung tissue from patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). ProSP-C contains a BRICHOS domain, in which many ILD-associated mutations are localized, and the BRICHOS domain can prevent SP-C from forming amyloid-like fibrils. Recent data suggest that recombinant BRICHOS domains from proSP-C and Bri2 (associated with familial dementia and amyloid formation) interact with peptides with a strong propensity to form beta-sheet structures, including amyloid beta-peptide associated with Alzheimer's disease. Such interactions efficiently delay formation of fibrils and oligomers. The BRICHOS domain is defined at the sequence level and is found in similar to 10 distantly related proprotein families. These have widely different or unknown functions, but several of the proteins are associated with human disease. Structural modeling of various BRICHOS domains, based on the X-ray structure of the proSP-C BRICHOS domain, identifies a conserved region that is structurally complementary to the beta-sheet- and/or amyloid-prone regions in the BRICHOS domain-containing proproteins. These observations make the BRICHOS domain the first example of a chaperone-like domain with specificity for beta-prone regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据