3.8 Article

Epidemiology of cardiovascular risk factors among schoolchildren in Sousse, Tunisia

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK
卷 8, 期 2, 页码 87-91

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00043798-200104000-00005

关键词

epidemiology; cardiovascular disease; risk factors; prevention; schoolchildren; Tunisia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In Tunisia, where the epidemiological transition phenomenon is well established, there are no data available at the population level on the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile for children, although it is well known that risk factor development takes place in childhood. Methods We report an epidemiological survey based on a representative sample of 1569 urban schoolchildren of Sousse in Tunisia to assess the following CVD risk factors: hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and other lipid disorders, obesity and tobacco consumption. Results The main results showed that girls had significantly higher levels of body mass index (BMI), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol than boys, who however had significantly higher levels of systolic blood pressure (SBP). Total cholesterol was significantly correlated to BMI and decreased with age. Obesity (BMI=27) was found in 7.9% of the study population and was significantly higher for girls (9.7%) than for boys (6%): X-2=9.02, DF=2, P= 0.011. Overweight (BMI=25) was also significantly higher for girls (16%) than for boys (11.1%): X-2=8.21, DF=1, P= 0.0041. Smoking habit concerned 7.6% of the study population; it was significantly higher for boys (14.7%) than for girls (1.1%): X-2=103.4, DF=1, P < 0.00001. Conclusion This study showed to some extent that Tunisia's urban population of schoolchildren is exposed early to CVD risk factors and all should be done to avoid the worsening of this profile. These results will serve as a baseline for assessment of future trends in the risk factors studied.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据