4.4 Article

NMR Characterization of Immunoglobulin G Fc Glycan Motion on Enzymatic Sialylation

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 22, 页码 4618-4626

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi300319q

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01GM033225, P41RR005351]
  2. NIH Kirschstein National Research Service [F32AR058084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The terminal carbohydrate residues of the N-glycan on the immunoglobulin G (IgG) fragment crystallizable (Fc) determine whether IgG activates pro- or anti-inflammatory receptors. The IgG Fc alone becomes potently antiinflammatory upon addition of alpha 2-6-linked N-acetylneuraminic acid residues to the N-glycan, stimulating interest in use of this entity in novel therapies for autoimmune disease [Kaneko et al. (2006) Science 313, 670-3]. Complete Fc sialylation has, however, been deemed challenging due to a combination of branch specificity and perceived protection by glycan-protein interactions. Here we report the preparation of high levels of disialylated Fc by using sufficient amounts of a highly active alpha 2-6 sialyltransferase (ST6Gal1) preparation expressed in a transiently transformed human cell culture. Surprisingly, ST6Gal1 sialylated the two termini of the complex-type binantennary glycan in a manner remarkably similar to that observed for the free N-glycan, suggesting the Fc polypeptide does not greatly influence ST6Gal1 specificity. In addition, sialylation of either branch terminus does not appear to dramatically alter the motional behavior of the N-glycan as judged by solution NMR spectroscopy. Together these, data suggest the N-glycan occupies two distinct states: one with both glycan termini sequestered from enzymatic modification by an alpha 1-6Man-branch interaction with the polypeptide surface and the other with both glycan termini exposed to the bulk solvent and free from glycan-polypeptide interactions. The results suggest new modes by which disialylated Fc can act as an anti-inflammatory effector.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据