4.7 Article

Effects of elevated carbon dioxide and increased nitrogen deposition on bog vegetation in the Netherlands

期刊

JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY
卷 89, 期 2, 页码 268-279

出版社

BLACKWELL SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00547.x

关键词

carbon dioxide; competitive interactions; plant species composition; Sphagnum; vascular plants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1 We studied the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 and increased N deposition on the plant species composition of a Sphagnum-dominated bog ecosystem in the Netherlands. Large peat monoliths (surface area 1 m(2), depth 0.6 m) with intact bog vegetation were kept outdoors in large containers and were exposed to elevated CO2 or increased N deposition for three growing seasons. Elevated CO2 conditions (target concentration 560 mu mol CO2 mol(-1)) were created using MiniFACE technology. In a separate experiment, N deposition was increased by 5 g N m(-2) year(-1) by adding dissolved NH4NO3 at 3 week intervals during the growing season. 2 Elevated atmospheric CO2 increased height growth of Sphagnum magellanicum, the dominant Sphagnum species, in the second and third growing seasons. Vascular plant biomass was not significantly affected by elevated CO2, but growth of species growing close to the moss surface was influenced negatively by the increased Sphagnum height growth. Elevated CO2 did not change allocation to below-ground plant parts. 3 Adding N increased above-ground vascular plant biomass. The shallow-rooted species Vaccinium oxycoccus responded most to the increased N deposition. Sphagnum growth was significantly reduced in the third growing season. This reduction was likely the result of the increased vascular plant cover, given the observed negative relation between vascular plant cover and Sphagnum growth. 4 The observed shifts in species composition as a result of species-specific responses to treatments, and interactions between peat mosses and vascular plants will have important consequences for the sequestration of carbon in the bog ecosystem.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据