4.5 Article

The pituitary-thyroid axis in healthy men living under subarctic climatological conditions

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
卷 169, 期 1, 页码 195-203

出版社

SOC ENDOCRINOLOGY
DOI: 10.1677/joe.0.1690195

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to evaluate the effects of climatic factors on the secretion of thyroid hormones and TSH in a high latitude population, we have taken serum and urine samples From 20 healthy men from northern Finland (67 degrees -68 degrees N) every 2 months for a period of 14 months. Serum free triiodothyronine (T-3) levels were lower in February than in August (3.9 vs 4.4 pmol/l, P<0.05) and TSH levels were higher in December than during other months (2.1 vs 1.5-1.7 mU/l, P<0.01). Serum total and free thyroxine (T-4), total T-3 and reverse T-3 levels and urinary T-4 levels were unchanged. Urinary T-3 levels were significantly higher in winter than in summer. Serum free T-3 correlated highly significantly with the outdoor temperature integrated backwards weekly for 7-56 days (r=0.26 for 1-56 days) from the day when the blood samples were taken. Serum TSH did not show any significant correlation with the thyroid hormones or with the integrated temperature of the previous days, but it did show an inverse and significant correlation (r= -0.31) with the ambient luminosity integrated backwards for 7 days front the day when the blood sample was taken. The gradually increasing correlation between outdoor temperatures and serum free T-3 suggests that the disposal of thyroid hormones is accelerated in winter, leading to low serum bet T-3 levels and a high urinary free T-3 excretion. Since there was no correlation between thyroid hormones and serum TSH, the feedback mechanism between TSH and thyroid hormones may not be the only contributing factor, and other factors such as ambient luminosity may at least partly determine serum TSH in these conditions. Also urinary free T3 appears to be a novel and non-invasive indicator for thyroid physiology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据