4.5 Article

Biofilm and saliva affect the biomechanical behavior of dental implants

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 48, 期 6, 页码 997-1002

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.02.004

关键词

Bone; Friction; Finite element analysis; Zirconium oxide; Titanium

资金

  1. FAEPEX UNICAMP [487310/2012-8]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Friction coefficient (FC) was quantified between titanium-titanium (Ti-Ti) and titanium-zirconia (Ti-Zr), materials commonly used as abutment and implants, in the presence of a multispecies biofilm (Bt) or salivary pellicle (Pel). Furthermore, FC was used as a parameter to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of a single implant-supported restoration. Interface between Ti-Ti and Ti-Zr without Pel or Bf was used as control (ad). FC was recorded using tribometer and analyzed by two-way Anova and Tukey test (p < 0.05). Data were transposed to a finite element model of a dental implant-supported restoration. Models were obtained varying abutment material (Ti and Zr) and FCs recorded (Bf, Pel, and Ctrl). Maximum and shear stress were calculated for bone and equivalent von Misses for prosthetic components. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05) and percentage of contribution for each condition (material and FC) was calculated. PC significant differences were observed between Ti-Ti and Ti-Zr for Ctrl and Bf groups, with lower values for Ti-Zr (p < 0.05). Within each material group, Ti-Ti differed between all treatments (p < 0.05) and for Ti-Zr, only Pel showed higher values compared with Ctrl and Bf (p < 0.05). PC contributed to 89.83% (p < 0.05) of the stress in the screw, decreasing the stress when the FC was lower. FC resulted in an increase of 59.78% of maximum stress in cortical bone (p = 0.05). It can be concluded that the shift of the FC due to the presence of Pel or Bf is able to jeopardize the biomechanical behavior of a single implant-supported restoration. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据