4.7 Article

MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: A feasibility study

期刊

RADIOLOGY
卷 219, 期 1, 页码 176-185

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMER
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.219.1.r01ap02176

关键词

breast neoplasms, MR; breast neoplasms, therapeutic radiology; breast neoplasms, therapeutic ultrasound (US); breast neoplasms, US; fibroadenoma

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 46627] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [282-97-0080, 67165] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To test the feasibility of noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery (FUS) of benign fibroadenomas in the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eleven fibroadenomas in nine patients under local anesthesia were treated with MR imaging-guided FUS. Based on a T2-weighted definition of target volumes, sequential sonications were delivered to treat the entire target. Temperature-sensitive phase-difference- based MR imaging was performed during each sonication to monitor focus localization and tissue temperature changes. After the procedure, T2-weighted and contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging were performed to evaluate immediate and long-term effects. RESULTS: Thermal imaging sequences were improved over the treatment period, with 82% (279 of 342) of the hot spots visible in the last seven treatments. The MR imager was used to measure temperature elevation (12.8 degrees -49.9 degreesC) from these treatments. Eight of the 11 lesions treated demonstrated complete or partial lack of contrast material uptake on posttherapy ii-weighted images. Three lesions showed no marked decrease of contrast material uptake. This lack of effective treatment was most likely due to a lower acoustic power and/or patient movement that caused misregistration. No adverse effects were detected, except for one case of transient edema in the pectoralis muscle 2 days after therapy. CONCLUSION: MR imaging-guided FUS can be performed to noninvasively coagulate benign breast fibroadenomas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据