4.4 Article

Looking over Toxin-K+ Channel Interactions. Clues from the Structural and Functional Characterization of α-KTx Toxin Tc32, a Kv1.3 Channel Blocker

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 9, 页码 1885-1894

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi201713z

关键词

-

资金

  1. FAPESP, Brazil [99/11030-9, 99/07574-3, 00/10266-8]
  2. [03/01921-0]
  3. [01/08095-3]
  4. [00/02026-7]
  5. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [00/10266-8] Funding Source: FAPESP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

alpha-KTx toxin Tc32, from the Amazonian scorpion Tityus cambridgei, lacks the dyad motif; including Lys27, characteristic of the family and generally associated with channel blockage. The toxin has been cloned and expressed for the first time. Electrophysiological experiments, by showing that the recombinant form blocks Kv1.3 channels of olfactory bulb periglomerular cells like the natural Tc32 toxin, when tested on the Kv1.3 channel of human T lymphocytes, confirmed it is in an active fold. The nuclear magnetic resonance-derived structure revealed it exhibits an alpha/beta scaffold typical of the members of the alpha-KTx family. TdK2 and TdK3, all belonging to the same alpha-KTx 18 subfamily, share significant sequence identity with Tc32 but diverse selectivity and affinity for Kv1.3 and Kv1.1 channels. To gain insight into the structural features that may justify those differences, we used the recombinant Tc32 nuclear magnetic resonance-derived structure to model the other two toxins, for which no experimental structure is available. Their interaction with Kv1.3 and Kv1.1 has been investigated by means of docking simulations. The results suggest that differences in the electrostatic features of the toxins and channels, in their contact surfaces, and in their total dipole moment orientations govern the affinity and selectivity of toxins. In addition, we found that, regardless of whether the dyad motif is present, it is always a Lys side chain that physically blocks the channels, irrespective of its position in the toxin sequence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据