4.4 Article

Serine 77 in the PDZ Domain of PICK1 Is a Protein Kinase Cα Phosphorylation Site Regulated by Lipid Membrane Binding

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 586-596

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi2014689

关键词

-

资金

  1. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen [314000-10-00000-3140103]
  2. University of Copenhagen
  3. National Institutes of Health [P01 DA 12408]
  4. Lundbeck Foundation
  5. Danish Medical Research Council
  6. Novo Nordisk Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PICK1 (protein interacting with C kinase 1) contains an N-terminal protein binding PDZ domain and a C-terminal lipid binding BAR domain. PICK1 plays a key role in several physiological processes, including synaptic plasticity. However, little is known about the cellular mechanisms governing the activity of PICK1 itself. Here we show that PICK1 is a substrate in vitro both for PKC alpha (protein kinase C alpha), as previously shown, and for CaMKII alpha (Ca2+-calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II alpha). By mutation of predicted phosphorylation sites, we identify Ser77 in the PDZ domain as a major phosphorylation site for PKC alpha. Mutation of Ser77 reduced the level of PKC alpha-mediated phosphorylation similar to 50%, whereas no reduction was observed upon mutation of seven other predicted sites. Addition of lipid vesicles increased the level of phosphorylation of Ser77 10-fold, indicating that lipid binding is critical for optimal phosphorylation. Binding of PKC alpha to the PICK1 PDZ domain was not required for phosphorylation, but a PDZ domain peptide ligand reduced the overall level of phosphorylation similar to 30%. The phosphomimic S77D reduced the extent of cytosolic clustering of eYFP-PICK1 in COS7 cells and thereby conceivably its lipid binding and/or polymerization capacity. We propose that PICK1 is phosphorylated at Ser77 by PKC alpha preferentially when bound to membrane vesicles and that this phosphorylation in turn modulates its cellular distribution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据